The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive explanation of HeyGen by visiting the marketing homepage, pricing page, features page, and alternatives page. The site published pricing and product positioning clearly enough for a full answer, but the agent had to reconcile multiple pages and rely on prior knowledge to clarify confusing details (especially the credit-to-video-minutes conversion). The site was navigable but not particularly agent-optimized — pricing details required cross-referencing, and the credit system's practical implications were not explicitly stated.

• ›Step [2] (homepage) provided positioning and broad feature overview; step [3] (pricing) gave tier names and credit amounts but not the practical minutes-per-month calculation; step [4] (features) likely detailed avatar count and language support; step [8] (alternatives page) gave competitor names but the agent supplemented with web search results to explain differentiators.
• ›The site published pricing and features in separate, modular pages rather than as a single agent-friendly artifact. The agent had to synthesize across /pricing, /features, and /alternatives, plus supplement with web search and cited external pricing analyses (Arcade, VidMeToo) to explain the credit system's real-world cost per minute.
• ›Critical gap in site clarity: pricing pages state '600 credits/month' without explaining that premium avatars cost 20 credits per minute (≈30 minutes of output), making the credit-to-content ratio implicit rather than explicit. The agent identified this as a major confusion point but had to infer it from external sources rather than from the official site pages.