Agent successfully gathered sufficient information to explain hanko.works' core offering, target markets, pricing, and competitive positioning. The site was navigable via direct URL guesses and internal links, but scattered pricing across pages and missing explicit competitor comparisons required the agent to synthesize fragments and note gaps.

• ›Pricing information was discoverable but fragmented: step [3] (/store) yielded individual pricing (¥5,000–9,000), step [6] (/en/corporate) yielded corporate pricing (¥24,000+), neither page was explicitly linked from homepage in navigation — agent had to guess URLs.
• ›Step [1] and [4] returned 404s for /pricing and /about, suggesting site structure is inconsistent or intentionally avoids dedicated price/about pages; agent successfully worked around this by finding pricing embedded in product pages.
• ›Step [0] and [2] (both homepage fetches) provided most competitive differentiation claims (seeding technology, eight styles, guarantees, studio preview); these facts were site-native, not inferred from model memory.
• ›Step [5] exposed site navigation structure and revealed corporate/gifts/journal resources; this meta-navigation step was crucial for discovering step [6], showing the site's own IA was the agent's primary discovery mechanism for content-bearing pages.
• ›Agent correctly identified missing information (no explicit competitors named, regional scope unclear, workshop process opaque) and attributed these to site gaps rather than claiming model knowledge—indicating good epistemic hygiene.