The agent assembled a reasonably complete overview of Stessens' business, target market, and differentiation by harvesting the homepage twice and supplementing with third-party reviews and competitive context. The website itself is minimally informative—it presents basic service descriptions and contact details but breaks on every major navigation path (Services, Pricing, Projects, About all 404), forcing the agent to rely on review platforms and search results to answer questions about pricing, quality, and competitive standing.

• ›The homepage (steps [1], [6]) was the only successful on-domain fetch; all attempts to navigate to Services, Pricing, Projects, About, or language variants returned 404, indicating the site either lacks these pages or has routing issues. The agent correctly identified this gap and named it as a confusing absence in the final response.
• ›Customer reviews (step [11] from Homeproved, and step [10] search snippet context) were essential to answering the 'differentiation' and 'quality' questions—the homepage does not surface customer testimonials or competitive positioning; the agent had to use external platforms to validate or contradict the homepage's claims.
• ›Pricing information was entirely absent from the site; the agent correctly reported this as a data gap and inferred positioning (premium, not budget) from review context, not from published material.
• ›Competitive context (major Belgian builders and their revenue scale) came from web search results (step [9]) that did not mention Stessens at all; the agent correctly contextualized Stessens as a small regional player by contrast, using model reasoning rather than retrieved facts.
• ›The agent cited sources appropriately in the final response, including the Homeproved reviews page ([11]) which it actually fetched and used for substantive review data, demonstrating good attribution discipline despite the site's poor navigation.