Agent successfully extracted OnlyWorlds' core positioning and pricing model from the site's /about and /start pages, but the site does not publish explicit competitive comparison or detailed feature scope, forcing the agent to characterize differentiators from inferred principles and model reasoning rather than stated claims.

• ›Step [2] (/about) was the primary content-bearing source, explicitly answering what OnlyWorlds is ('language for worldbuilding: one structure, local-first text files'), who it serves ('worldbuilders'), and positioning it as 'infrastructure' rather than a platform — this was the site's clearest articulation of identity.
• ›Step [3] (/start) confirmed free pricing but provided no details on feature scope, limitations, or monetization model — the site publishes only that 'onlyworlds.com offers free hosting' without explaining what is and isn't included.
• ›The agent had to infer competitive differentiation (local-first, open standards, ecosystem approach) from the site's emphasis on 'open worldbuilding standard' and scattered mentions of API/plugins, not from explicit competitor comparison the site never provided.
• ›Step [1] (homepage, fetched twice) offered minimal unique content beyond routing to /about and /start — the site does not use its homepage to answer the core discovery questions (what, who, price, why different).
• ›The agent correctly flagged that use-case specificity and monetization strategy were absent from the site, reflecting real gaps in the site's own content rather than agent failure to find sections.