Agent successfully gathered enough information to explain depouch's core function, audience, and differentiation. However, the site itself did not clearly publish pricing or competitive positioning; the agent had to piece these insights from a third-party THORChain blog post and infer gaps from what the main site omitted.

• ›Homepage and swap page (steps [1]–[3]) provided basic overview but explicitly lacked pricing details; agent correctly identified these as missing and searched elsewhere.
• ›Critical information—the 0.3% fee structure and design philosophy—came from an external THORChain blog article (step [6]), not depouch's own site, indicating depouch does not self-publish its pricing transparently.
• ›Blog content (step [4]) existed on depouch's domain but was indexed by search (step [5]) rather than naturally discoverable from the homepage, suggesting weak internal navigation to explainers.
• ›Agent's final answer included a 'What Was Confusing' section grounded in what the site did NOT contain (placeholder fee displays, no FAQ, no competitor comparison), demonstrating accurate gap detection.
• ›Swap interface showing '$0' in total fees (step [3]) actively misled; the actual 0.3% fee was not visible on depouch's own pages, forcing agent reliance on external sources.