The agent successfully built a comprehensive answer about UiTinVlaanderen's purpose, audience, pricing, and positioning, but was blocked from accessing the site directly and had to reconstruct understanding from search results and a third-party project page; the site's HTTP 405 errors and inaccessibility significantly hindered direct verification.

• ›The target site itself was inaccessible via automated fetch (405 errors on both bare and www URLs), forcing the agent to rely entirely on search results and external sources rather than primary content.
• ›Step [9] fetched publiq.be (external organization page) and provided concrete, structured information about the service's features, audience scale, and free-to-submit model—this became a core source.
• ›Search result snippets (steps [5], [11], [13]) contained enough factual density about the service's role, scale, and subsidy model to answer the task without requiring the site's own pages to load.
• ›The agent correctly identified what it could not verify (competitors, specific UI features, exact revenue model) and flagged these gaps honestly, showing awareness of incompleteness.
• ›No fetched page from uitinvlaanderen.be itself appeared in the success chain; all substantive content came from search results or the publiq.be project page, indicating the site publishes little in a directly fetchable form.