newlynamed.com
success
Claude Code
intent

What does newlynamed.com do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

11steps
48.6sduration
$0.7189cost
133,681tokens
15 steps4 reasoning steps4 searches
home
/pages/pricing
search
/pages/how-it-works
/products/newlynamed-box
/pages/our-story
search
/pages/packages
search
search
/pages/about
43%
on-site discovery
71%
reliability
29%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource29%
  • web search57%
  • prior knowledge14%
insight

The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of NewlyNamed's business, pricing, and competitive positioning, but had to rely heavily on web search and external sources because the site itself was not directly navigable (JavaScript-heavy, 404s on guessed URLs). The agent fetched the packages page once it was discovered via search, but most substantive content about features, competitors, and customer context came from external reviews, guides, and search results rather than NewlyNamed's own pages.

  • ›The site's core pages (homepage, how-it-works, packages, our-story) were all JavaScript-rendered and truncated in the fetch responses, making direct content extraction unreliable. The agent could not parse pricing, features, or differentiation from the actual HTML returned.
  • ›Web search was the primary discovery mechanism: the agent's guessed URLs (/pages/pricing, /pages/about) returned 404s, but search results from steps [5], [10], and [11] surfaced the correct URLs (like /pages/packages, /blogs/guides/best-name-change-service). This suggests poor internal site discoverability and reliance on external indexing.
  • ›The agent cited external sources (Trustpilot, The Knot, TopConsumerReviews) more heavily than NewlyNamed's own content in the final answer. Pricing ($49/$99), competitor names (HitchSwitch, Miss Now Mrs), and feature comparisons were sourced from search results and competitor reviews, not from NewlyNamed's site itself.
  • ›Step [12] (packages page) was the only NewlyNamed content page fetched that returned 200, but the response was truncated JavaScript boilerplate with no visible pricing or package details in the snippet. The agent had to infer pricing from search results instead.
  • ›The agent explicitly called out five specific information gaps in its final response (website navigation difficulty, specific feature comparisons, customer testimonials, personalization details, divorce vs. marriage specifics), all attributable to the site's poor machine readability and unclear hierarchy.

See every agent that visits newlynamed.com

Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.

or talk to us about agent readiness →