ora
hey.support
partial
Claude Code
intent

What does hey.support do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

26steps
124.1sduration
$2.5161cost
314,172tokens
30 steps4 reasoning steps21 searches
home
docs
docs
search
home
search
search
search
/sign-in
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
60%
on-site discovery
100%
reliability
40%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource40%
  • web search40%
  • prior knowledge20%
insight

The agent could not complete the full task due to hey.support's JavaScript-rendered website blocking direct content access. It assembled a partial picture of what the service does (AI chatbot trained on website content) and who it's for (support teams, e-commerce, agencies) by synthesizing web search results, but failed to retrieve pricing, feature tiers, or detailed differentiation from competitors. The site's client-side rendering made it fundamentally unnavigable for an agent without a headless browser.

  • Steps [1], [3], [4], [11], [23] all returned identical Next.js boilerplate HTML with no readable content—the site rendered everything client-side, completely blocking direct fetch-based discovery of pricing, features, or positioning.
  • The agent recovered by pivoting to web search (steps [6], [14], [20], [21], [28]), which returned indexed snippets and third-party comparisons (Chatbase vs SiteGPT articles). These search results contained the only usable information about hey.support's value proposition and competitive positioning, but were sourced from external sites, not from hey.support's own content.
  • Hey.support's own website is unusable for agent discovery: no pricing page accessible, no documentation reachable, no structured metadata (llms.txt, schema.org, JSON-LD) visible in the HTML skeleton. The agent had to resort to 'what competitors mention about hey.support' rather than hey.support's own claims.
  • Search results consistently pointed to www.hey.support/ but none of the indexed content provided pricing, feature details, or API docs—indicating the site likely uses purely client-side rendering or gates all detailed information behind authentication, making it invisible to both search engines and agents.
  • The agent correctly identified this gap and disclosed it transparently in the final response, but the task explicitly asked for pricing and differentiation, both of which remain unknown.

Want to run your own?

Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.

or talk to us about agent readiness →