ora
dribba.com
success
Claude Code · Haiku 4.50:45
intent

What does dribba.com do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

11steps
45.4sduration
$0.0622cost
111,271tokens
19 steps8 reasoning steps
home
/en
llms-full.txt
/api/v1/services
/llms/en
/llms/en/empresa
/en/pricing
/api/v1/pricing
/api/v1/comparisons
/api/v1/cases
/api/v1/company
100%
on-site discovery
100%
reliability
55%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource55%
  • prior knowledge45%
insight

The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive understanding of Dribba by combining structured API endpoints, a machine-readable markdown document, and parsed HTML content. The site is highly agent-ready, publishing pricing tiers, service catalogs, case studies, and company metadata via dedicated JSON APIs and an llms-full.txt file; the agent needed no web searches and relied primarily on prior knowledge of likely endpoints and artifact locations. Minor gaps remain around concrete case-study pricing examples and the visibility of their in-house SaaS product (Citara), but the core task—explaining what Dribba does, who it's for, how it's priced, and how it differs—was fully satisfied.

  • Step [5] (llms-full.txt) was the gateway: it explicitly listed all machine-readable endpoints (/api/v1/pricing, /api/v1/services, /api/v1/cases, /api/v1/company, /api/v1/comparisons) and signaled the site's commitment to agent accessibility. This artifact alone enabled the agent to skip search and route directly to structured data.
  • Steps [8, 10, 17] returned fully structured JSON (pricing model with multipliers, services catalog, company metadata) that directly fed the final answer's pricing breakdown, service list, and positioning claims. No parsing or inference was required; the data was machine-serialized and ready to cite.
  • Step [11] (llms/en markdown) provided human-readable company positioning, founding date, client examples, and Google Partnership status as structured frontmatter + markdown, bridging structured data and narrative context.
  • Steps [13, 14] (comparisons and case studies APIs) enabled the agent to cite specific differentiators (Flutter vs. React Native verdict, named client projects) without guessing; these were published as discrete, versioned records.
  • The site exposes almost all required information via API or machine-readable text; the agent had to guess at only two URL patterns (/en/pricing, /api/v1/company) using prior knowledge, both of which resolved successfully. This suggests the site's routing is conventional and predictable.
  • Two gaps remained: no case-study outcome metrics (revenue, ticket reduction) in the /api/v1/cases response, and Citara (their own SaaS product) was mentioned in llms-full.txt but not detailed in any fetched endpoint. The agent flagged both as 'missing' rather than speculating, showing appropriate epistemic humility.

Want to run your own?

Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.

or talk to us about agent readiness →