Agent successfully gathered and synthesized what Forta Health does, who it serves, and its pricing constraints from two fetched pages (homepage and FAQ). The site publishes enough to explain the service but leaves critical details sparse — pricing figures, study methodology, clinical specifics, and competitor comparison are either absent or unsourced, requiring the agent to flag gaps rather than fill them.

• ›Pricing is deliberately opaque: Forta publishes no rate cards, examples, or self-pay options ('We are not accepting out of pocket payments at this time'), forcing families to request quotes. The agent correctly noted this absence rather than inferring costs.
• ›Eligibility rules are scattered across pages: diagnosis age limits (5 years, 3 for Texas Medicaid), service-area exclusions (7 states), and commitment thresholds (10–15 hours/week) are distributed between homepage and FAQ, requiring synthesis.
• ›Outcome claims lack evidentiary substance: the 2x/87%/127% figures reference an 'April 2024 study' by title only, with no link to methodology, sample size, or baseline. The agent correctly identified this as unsupported and did not hallucinate details.
• ›Waitlist claim is internally inconsistent: homepage asserts 'eliminates waitlists' but FAQ never mentions a waitlist at all, creating ambiguity about whether the claim is genuine or rhetorical. Agent flagged this conflict.
• ›Insurance acceptance claims are vague: '300+ policies' and '47 states + D.C.' are mentioned on the homepage, but the FAQ qualifies this with state-by-state variation and excludes 7 named states, requiring the agent to reconcile rather than trust the larger number.