The agent fetched the homepage and pricing page, which together gave a thorough, well-structured picture of the service, pricing, and terms, and it transparently flagged pages it did not open. The site was highly navigable and agent-ready, with the answer publicly available in fetchable pages, though the Pilot's post-term price and some terms remained unstated.

• ›Homepage and prijzen.html together carried nearly all the substantive content (service, audience, all pricing tiers, add-ons, cancellation), so the answer was grounded in fetched site text rather than memory.
• ›Pricing was laid out clearly per tier with explicit setup vs. monthly fees, making it easy for an agent to extract and compare.
• ›Several important terms (Pilot price after 12 months, Pilot cancellation rights, payment-provider fees, refund policy) were absent from the fetched pages and the agent correctly reported them as gaps.
• ›The agent's competitive comparison relied entirely on the site's own illustrative figures and claims; no independent competitor data was gathered, limiting the 'vs alternatives' answer.
• ›Several linked pages (werkwijze, demo, FAQ, terms) were not opened, so the agent honestly disclosed reliance on homepage summaries for those areas.