The agent retrieved and synthesized content from two pages (homepage and /order policy) to explain Ondelva's skins, pricing, and service model, but encountered unresolved conflicts (price disclosure) and missing details (Cool Glow availability, refund terms not on homepage, undefined key terms) that prevent a fully confident explanation. The site is navigable but information is scattered and inconsistent across pages.

• ›Price conflict: the homepage lists specific prices (₩200k–₩300k+) but the /order page states 'no prices are listed' and directs buyers to the Design Center. The agent flagged but could not resolve this contradiction from the fetched content.
• ›Cool Glow product status is ambiguous: labeled 'in preparation' with no price, yet a demo link is present; the site does not clarify whether it is currently purchasable.
• ›Refund policy appears only on /order and contradicts the homepage's silence: cancellation is only pre-work; no refunds post-start. This material term is not disclosed upfront.
• ›Key terms ('skin defect', 'minor vs. out-of-scope change') are undefined across both pages, forcing buyers to infer scope from examples alone.
• ›The agent did not fetch skin detail pages, FAQs, or manuals, so claimed differentiators (OnEdit capabilities, responsive design, sample shop access) are verified only from the homepage, which notes its editor demo is a 'simulation' and may differ from the live tool.