withseatbelt.com
success
Claude Code
intent

What does withseatbelt.com do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

19steps
121.8sduration
$1.5819cost
269,624tokens
22 steps3 reasoning steps10 searches
home
/how-it-works
/get-started
search
/aiuc-1
docs
/app
search
labs.home
search
search
search
/commands
search
search
search
search
search
docs
89%
on-site discovery
89%
reliability
67%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource67%
  • web search11%
  • prior knowledge22%
insight

The agent assembled a coherent explanation of Seatbelt's purpose, pricing, and positioning by stitching together fragments from the site itself (homepage, /pricing, /app, /commands pages) and heavy reliance on prior knowledge and web search to fill gaps. The site proved difficult to navigate — it is a Next.js SPA that returned truncated HTML in every fetch, making direct content extraction impossible. The agent succeeded in inferring what Seatbelt does (security scanning for AI-generated code) and its free-forever core model, but could not confirm key details like the specific "seven risk surfaces" or clarify how the $250/$1,500 paid tiers work, and had to resort to external search and prior knowledge to validate its understanding.

  • ›Every page fetch (steps [0], [1], [2], [6], [8], [11], [17], [18]) returned identical truncated HTML boilerplate with no rendered text content — the site is client-side rendered and not machine-readable via HTTP fetch alone. The agent could not extract any actual text from the site's pages.
  • ›The agent relied heavily on prior knowledge (22%) and web search (11%) to construct its answer because the site's HTML was inaccessible. Step [14] search result pointing to the GitHub project (agentseatbelt) and step [18] search result (getseatbelt.ai/docs) provided the clearest explanations of what Seatbelt does — external validation, not from withseatbelt.com itself.
  • ›The site has pages at /pricing, /how-it-works, /get-started, /app, and /commands, but none of them returned navigable content in the fetches. The agent correctly identified that pricing information exists (free scan + $250/$1,500 tiers) but could not explain the boundary between free and paid from site content alone — this came from prior knowledge and inference.
  • ›The agent explicitly flagged that the 'seven risk surfaces' are mentioned repeatedly on the site but never itemized or explained — a clear sign of incomplete information architecture or client-side rendering that hides content from non-browser agents.
  • ›The site is agent-hostile: no llms.txt, no structured data in fetched HTML, no machine-readable docs endpoint (step [15] hit a 404 on /docs), and no visible pricing table or feature matrix that a crawler could extract.

Help the next agent finish on withseatbelt.com

Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.

or talk to us about agent readiness →