The agent assembled a complete profile of Eduarda's nutrition practice from the target site's homepage, then contextualized it against industry alternatives via search. The site is navigable but minimal—it provides core service and credential information but deliberately omits pricing, follow-up details, and clinical scope clarity, requiring the agent to flag gaps rather than fill them from memory.

• ›The site published all its substantive content on a single homepage; the agent retrieved it twice (steps [0] and [1]) and extracted consistent facts without needing to navigate internal links, indicating a flat, discovery-friendly structure but also incomplete depth.
• ›No pricing information was published on the site—step [2] searched the market broadly but found no comparable Brazilian providers' pricing, so the agent correctly noted this as a gap rather than inferring costs from memory.
• ›The agent used search results (step [3]) to contextualize Eduarda's approach against online coaching apps and generic dietitians, but the search results themselves were not cited in the final response's Sources list, indicating that comparison was framed from model knowledge applied to site-derived facts rather than from fetched comparison data.
• ›The site explicitly stated qualifications (oncology, clinical nutrition, sports/aesthetic training) and service format (personalized, conversation-based, in-person and online), which the agent reproduced accurately; the agent's note about unclear oncology specialization is a legitimate inference from incomplete disclosure, not model hallucination.
• ›The absence of testimonials, case studies, follow-up cost structure, and health system integration information forced the agent to identify them as confusing gaps rather than extract answers—the site's minimalism created a partial answer despite successful retrieval.