The agent fetched the homepage, pricing, and KTi pages directly and built a clear explanation of Kaonavi from the site's own content, then used a search to supplement competitive context. The site was highly navigable and surfaced most of what was asked, though pricing was intentionally withheld and KTi details were thin.

• ›The homepage, /price, and /kti pages were all fetchable and gave a clear, structured picture of products, audience, and claims.
• ›Pricing is quote-only: the site describes the pricing logic (modules plus user-count bands) but publishes no yen figures, so the agent could not state actual costs from the site.
• ›KTi's page is detailed on use cases but vague on usage limits, base-plan inclusion, and accuracy, leaving several questions unanswered.
• ›Competitive differentiation rests on the company's own claims (rankings, client counts, awards); independent comparison required a web search, which is where the competitor facts came from.
• ›The site mixes dated and current material (2015–2022 market-share sources), which the agent flagged rather than presenting as current.