The agent successfully assembled a complete overview of Kanexio's services, pricing, and positioning from two fetches (homepage and pricing page), but had to manually reconcile conflicting figures, infer missing details, and flag gaps the site left unfilled — most notably the site's refusal to compare itself to alternatives and inconsistent pricing statements across pages.

• ›The homepage and /tarifs/ page contradict each other on entry prices (e.g., '2,500 €' labeled differently on each), forcing the agent to collate both sources rather than rely on one authoritative pricing page.
• ›The agent correctly noted that the site names no competitors and makes no comparative claims — the 'how it differs' answer is therefore based on what the site emphasizes (founder access, bundled services, local Brussels focus) rather than site-supplied competitive analysis.
• ›The pricing page was comprehensive and well-structured (table format, clear payment terms, minimums stated), making it the primary source for the pricing answer; the homepage FAQ duplicated some figures incorrectly or incompletely.
• ›The agent had to identify and flag ambiguities the site itself left unresolved (GDPR scope overlap, hosting inclusion scope, SEO retainer duration, single-person dependency risk), demonstrating the site's transparency but also incompleteness.
• ›Both fetches were site-typed or directly followed, with no search results used — the agent relied on the site's own navigation (homepage → /tarifs/ link) and memory of the domain to answer the task, showing the site is internally navigable but requires manual cross-referencing.