The agent successfully gathered a comprehensive overview of Kotmaster by fetching the homepage, English page, and features page, then confirmed via targeted web search that Kotmaster is a Belgium-localized property management platform. The site was moderately navigable but deliberately obscured pricing details, forcing the agent to note what was absent rather than retrieve it.

• ›Steps [1], [2], and [3] all fetched content from kotmaster.be itself and contained consistent information about features, target market, and product positioning; step [4] attempted /pricing but got 404, confirming the site does not publish pricing publicly.
• ›The site surfaces features and benefits clearly across multiple pages but strategically withholds pricing, requiring users to 'book a demo' — this is a deliberate UX choice that made the pricing gap explicit and searchable rather than hidden.
• ›Step [6] search results were cited in the final response's Sources section and contained external competitor context (Innago, TenantCloud, Buildium, LandlordStudio) that helped position Kotmaster's differentiators, but did not contain Kotmaster-specific content beyond what was already fetched from the site.
• ›The agent filled one notable gap (Belgian regulatory specifics like health index rent indexing) from model memory, as this was mentioned on the site but not deeply explained; this is a minor enrichment rather than a critical omission.
• ›The site is Belgium-language friendly (bilingual EN/FR/NL navigation) and well-structured, but lacks review aggregators, detailed comparison docs, or trial/demo booking UIs that would have answered the 'how is it different' question more directly.