The agent assembled a partial but substantive overview from the homepage and services page, covering offerings, target industries, and claimed differentiation. However, it could not answer the pricing question (no data published), didn't navigate to case studies or market-specific pages that might deepen the picture, and lacked independent verification of competitive claims.

• ›Pricing is genuinely absent from both fetched pages — the site does not publish rates, minimums, or engagement models, only a vague reference to an 'agile contract model' without explanation. This is a material gap the agent correctly flagged rather than guessed around.
• ›The agent discovered both content-bearing steps by typing/following from the homepage (50/50 mix per trajectory); the site's own navigation surfaced the services page, but case studies (Projekte), market detail (Märkte), and blog were linked but not fetched, leaving potential depth untapped.
• ›Homepage content was truncated and had headings without visible list items — the agent flagged this as a technical barrier rather than inferring what should have been there, showing appropriate epistemic caution.
• ›The agent correctly resisted claiming independent differentiation verification, noting it could not compare against competitors and that client testimonials were self-reported; this is an appropriate boundary, not a failure.
• ›The site is German-language; the agent worked from fetched content but notes translation loss, correctly attributing interpretation gaps to language barrier rather than missing data.