Agent successfully gathered core information about Tangent's business, products, and positioning from the company's own website, but encountered intentional opacity around pricing and struggled with competing Tangent entities discovered via search. The site is well-structured for discovery but deliberately obscures commercial terms.

• ›Steps [4], [5], [6] each fetched successfully and contained substantive product, industry, and service information, directly cited in final response. The site surfaces its core positioning and feature differentiation clearly.
• ›Pricing is completely absent from public site content — all three fetches returned no price data, forcing the agent to note this as a primary gap. Tangent deliberately routes all pricing inquiries to sales contact forms and phone numbers, making this a designed-in discovery barrier.
• ›Agent correctly identified competitor names from search results [step 7], not from site content, showing that site does not mention alternatives or market positioning relative to others.
• ›Multiple Tangent entities (tangent.com, tangent.works, jointangent.com) appeared in search results but agent could not clarify their relationship from fetched site content alone — this confusion was model-inferred, not resolved by navigation.
• ›Initial fetch [step 1] returned 403 Forbidden on root domain, forcing reliance on search results to discover correct entry points ([step 3]), demonstrating the site's accessibility configuration may have impeded direct navigation.