The agent gathered a serviceable overview of the clinic's core offerings, target market, and basic contact details but could not provide complete pricing or emergency policies. The site publishes its main content on the homepage and via an llms.txt file, but requires fetching separate pages (practical information, team details) to answer deeper questions — which the agent did not do.

• ›The homepage (step [0]) was the sole content-bearing fetch of the clinic's own domain; it contained all serviceable facts about services, team, hours, and contact. Step [1] (llms.txt) was a discovery artifact that listed fees and page structure but did not fetch the actual practical-information page, so specific fee details remain unverified against the source.
• ›Pricing is deliberately sparse: the site publishes only two surcharges (600 Kč weekend, 200–600 Kč after-hours exotic) and no consultation or procedure fees. The agent correctly identified this as missing rather than inferring from model memory.
• ›The agent did not fetch vet-klinika.cz/prakticke-informace or vet-klinika.cz/nas-tym despite llms.txt identifying them as content pages. This left the final response incomplete on team details, exact fee structure, and emergency procedures.
• ›The llms.txt file served as a router and fee summary, but the agent cited it as a source and included corrupted text ('v터') in the trajectory, suggesting either encoding or truncation issues that reduced its reliability.
• ›The agent inferred several gaps (no emergency policy, no doctor schedules, no competitor comparison) from the absence of content rather than from fetched pages, correctly marking these as 'missing' rather than claiming they were stated.