The agent successfully answered the core task (what Tablein does, who it serves, and how it differs), but had to work around the site's poor information architecture. The homepage delivered basic positioning and features, but pricing information was entirely absent from tablein.lt itself—the agent found pricing through web search results pointing to tablein.com (a different domain) and a third-party comparison article, then had to synthesize a complete picture from fragments.

• ›The site's own pricing page (/pricing) and restaurant landing page (/restoranams) both returned 404s, forcing the agent to rely on external sources. Pricing came from tablein.com search results, not the target domain.
• ›The homepage (step 1) provided service positioning and feature overview but was not the primary source for most task sections. The agent had to supplement it with search and external comparison content.
• ›The comparison article (step 8) was the richest content-bearing source, providing concrete differentiators (verified reviews, all-features-included, regional dominance, branded pages) that the site itself did not explicitly articulate.
• ›Search results (step 7) contained the exact pricing figures and plan structure, but these were sourced from tablein.com snippets and third-party aggregators, not from the target domain tablein.lt.
• ›The agent correctly flagged unfindable details (commissions, support tiers, integrations, API docs) as missing—these genuinely were not published on the public site or in search-accessible content.