The agent gathered a substantial but incomplete picture by reading the homepage and EBS page. Core claims about the payroll audit, pricing, and the EBS benefit structure came from the site; however, critical details about savings mechanisms, guarantee application, economic fit screening, and competitive positioning remain unexplained or missing from the pages fetched.

• ›The homepage and EBS page contained most of the factual foundation (what, who, price, legal hooks), but the site deferred explanation of core concepts: 'payroll reserves' is never defined, EBS cost-split is unstated, and the guarantee thresholds are presented without frequency or success-rate context.
• ›The agent followed only 2 out of roughly 15+ internal links visible in the navigation (audit, EBS, industries, regions, accounting audiences, knowledge center, case studies, methodology, legal basis, FAQ, guarantee terms, about, contact). It did not read the /warunki-gwarancji, /metodologia-i-definicje, or /podstawy-prawne pages, which are explicitly listed and likely contain the missing legal and operational detail.
• ›The site surfaces pricing and core messaging clearly on the homepage in a fetchable, machine-readable form (table format); however, the EBS offering has no price stated anywhere on its dedicated page, and an audit-support 'abonament' is mentioned in passing without cost.
• ›The 'B2B' reference ('without moving employees to B2B') appears only as a form option label with no explanation of scope or risks, suggesting the site audience is assumed to understand internal Polish payroll terminology and restructuring concepts.
• ›The agent explicitly noted limitations ('I did not open the guarantee terms, methodology, legal basis, or FAQ pages, so those gaps may be answered there'), indicating the site structure surfaces relevant pages but the agent did not navigate into them—a discovery/access limitation rather than a site presentation failure.