noma.security
success
Claude Code
intent

What does noma.security do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

13steps
62.6sduration
$0.6983cost
111,565tokens
15 steps2 reasoning steps4 searches
home
docs
/features
docs
search
/platform/agentic-acce…
search
/platform
/use-cases
search
/discover
search
docs
89%
on-site discovery
56%
reliability
44%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource44%
  • web search11%
  • prior knowledge44%
insight

The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive explanation of Noma Security's product, target market, and positioning by combining fetched homepage and platform pages with prior knowledge and web search context. However, the task is only partially satisfied because pricing—explicitly required by the task—could not be found on the site; the agent had to report this as a gap rather than deliver the information. The site's public pages are sparse and largely HTML shells, forcing heavy reliance on prior knowledge (44%) and external sources rather than machine-readable content.

  • ›Step [1] (homepage) and step [6] (/platform) returned minimal substantive content—mostly meta tags and truncated HTML. The agent extracted positioning ('AI Security Platform for LLMs, RAG, & AI Agents') and core concepts ('discover, govern, and protect AI agents') from page titles and descriptions, not body content.
  • ›Step [8] (/platform/agentic-access-control) was the most content-rich and specific page fetched, containing details about per-agent/per-tool policies and the 'no gateways' differentiator. This single product-deep page carried disproportionate weight in the final answer.
  • ›Pricing (a core task requirement) is not published on the site—steps [2] (/pricing) and [7] (/use-cases) returned 404s. The agent correctly identified this gap and reported it as a confusing/missing element, but this means the task was not fully satisfied.
  • ›The agent relied on prior knowledge for the three-phase framework (Discovery, Security Testing, Runtime Enforcement), the Agentic Risk Map concept, and customer examples (UiPath, Best Buy, Nielsen). This content was not fetched from noma.security.
  • ›Competitors and alternatives came from web search context (step [10]), not from the site itself, which does not publicly position against alternatives.
  • ›The site is poorly navigable for agent discovery: standard paths like /pricing, /features, /use-cases, and /discover all returned 404s. Only /about, /platform, and specific product pages (/platform/agentic-access-control) resolved. This forced the agent to guess at URLs and rely on search results.

Want to run your own?

Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.

or talk to us about agent readiness →