ora
swiss-ablation.com
success
Claude Code · Haiku 4.51:25
intent

What does swiss-ablation.com do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

20steps
85.0sduration
$1.2684cost
209,868tokens
30 steps10 reasoning steps9 searches
home
/en
/treatment
/uber-uns
/preise
/kosten
/en/about
search
/en/ablation-413.htm
/en/international-pati…
/en/cardiology-355.htm
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
/dienstleistungen
82%
on-site discovery
36%
reliability
64%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource64%
  • web search18%
  • prior knowledge18%
insight

The agent successfully pieced together a comprehensive overview of Swiss Ablation by combining fragments from the site's content pages with web search results, since the site's primary navigation and internal structure were largely inaccessible (many direct URLs returned 404s or incomplete HTML). The agent delivered a credible answer about what they do, who they serve, and key differentiators, but pricing transparency could not be found on the site itself—a notable gap the agent correctly flagged.

  • Steps [14] and [16] returned actual service content (ablation procedures and cardiology/electrophysiology offerings) with usable descriptions and titles, but HTML responses were truncated and incomplete, suggesting heavy JavaScript rendering or access restrictions.
  • The site's URL structure proved opaque: direct guesses at /uber-uns, /preise, /dienstleistungen, /treatment, and /kosten all returned 404s, forcing the agent to rely on web search [12, 21, 22, 24] to discover working URLs like /en/ablation-413.htm and /en/cardiology-355.htm—these were not surfaced by site navigation.
  • Pricing information (a core task requirement) was entirely absent from accessible site content; the agent had to rely on external benchmarks ("15,000–50,000 CHF") sourced from prior knowledge and search context, not from the clinic's own disclosure.
  • The agent never successfully fetched the /en/consultation-contact/international-patients-371.htm page (step [15] returned 404), yet cited it in the final response's source list—indicating the agent assembled the claim about international services from search snippets and external sources like bestclinicabroad.com [22] rather than direct site content.
  • The site is poorly agent-navigable: main navigation links are not discoverable through direct URL patterns, truncated HTML responses block full content parsing, and key pages (pricing, team bios, international services) are either missing, gated, or inaccessible—forcing heavy reliance on web search and prior knowledge (64% of fetches came from prior artifacts/search context).

Want to run your own?

Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.

or talk to us about agent readiness →