Agent successfully gathered enough information to explain wordradar's purpose, features, pricing, and positioning, but the site left critical operational details undocumented—credit costs per endpoint, post-beta pricing, rate limits, and how to obtain invite codes. The agent had to retrieve two pages and flag gaps rather than fill them from memory.

• ›Homepage alone answered ~70% of the task (what it does, beta status, high-level pricing tiers), but required the /docs page to clarify free-tier credit amounts (50 + 5/day) and confirm that only one endpoint's credit cost was documented—a significant gap for comparing pack value.
• ›Site published no competitor names or direct comparisons, only generic claims ('incumbents gate at $199+/month')—the agent noted this lack of evidence clearly rather than inferring specifics from memory.
• ›Critical operational unknowns (credit costs for Proxy-KD, Domain Timeline, Trends; post-beta pricing; rate limits; invite code acquisition) were absent from both fetched pages, forcing the agent to highlight them as unresolved rather than speculate.
• ›MCP server URL uses www-prefixed domain (www.wordradar.dev/mcp) while homepage uses bare domain—a discrepancy the agent caught and flagged as a potential concern.
• ›Agent reached the docs page via a link on the homepage, confirming the site does surface its technical reference, but the docs were incomplete (credit costs, rate limits, data refresh details missing), making the site less agent-ready than its structure suggests.