The agent successfully explained what Silhouette does, who it's for, how it differs from competitors, and the team/funding background by assembling information from third-party sources and external blog posts—but could not locate the published fee structure despite extensive attempts to access the site's own documentation and multiple targeted fee-specific searches. The site's primary marketing pages and documentation were either inaccessible (404s on docs routes) or did not expose pricing details in a machine-readable form.

• ›Content-bearing steps [9] and [10] came from external sources (Impossible Finance blog and RockawayX article), not from silhouette.exchange itself—the agent had to rely on third-party coverage to explain core functionality (TEE matching, MEV protection, dark pools analogy).
• ›The agent made 6+ direct attempts to find fee information (steps [6], [13], [16], [28], [30]) including targeted searches for 'pricing', 'fees', 'commissions', and dedicated doc routes like /guide/fees and /guide/getting-started—all returned either 404s or unrelated results, indicating the site does not publish pricing in an accessible or findable location.
• ›The docs.silhouette.exchange domain exists and is cited in sources but was unreachable or returned 404s when the agent tried to access specific pages ([4], [15], [16], [21])—suggesting either a stale sitemap, incomplete documentation structure, or content gates that prevent web scraping.
• ›Step [18] (The Block founder interview) was located via search but not fetched directly in the trajectory shown; however, it is cited in the final response, indicating the agent synthesized information from search snippets and external coverage rather than primary source material.
• ›The agent never accessed app.silhouette.exchange directly to check if pricing is posted in the application itself—this was mentioned as existing but not visited, suggesting a gap in discovery or that the agent assumed app-level UX was out of scope.