The agent fetched the homepage, pricing, and FAQ pages directly and assembled a thorough, well-sourced explanation of SchoolyUp covering product, audience, pricing, and gaps. The site was fully navigable and its content was readily fetchable, though it lacked explicit competitor comparisons and some plan details.

• ›Homepage, pricing (/tarifs), and FAQ pages were all reachable and returned substantive content, letting the agent ground nearly every claim in fetched text.
• ›Pricing details were split and partly inconsistent across pages (e.g., Fondateurs €39.99/year for life vs. first year only; trial vs. money-back guarantee wording), which the agent had to reconcile and flag.
• ›The only comparison to alternatives was the site's own ChatGPT table, so the 'differentiation' answer rests on marketing claims rather than independent comparison content.
• ›Several named features (exam mode, parent co-pilot, explanation levels, streak grace window) are mentioned without definitions, leaving the agent unable to explain them.
• ›Key facts such as the underlying AI model, institutional licensing, and the DPIA document were absent or unlinked, and the agent correctly reported these as unanswered rather than filling them from memory.