Agent gathered core positioning, audience, and differentiation from the homepage, but pricing remains intentionally hidden behind contact gates. The site was minimally navigable—all information came from repeated fetches of the root page, requiring the agent to make inferences about competitive differentiation and acknowledge explicit gaps (pricing, curriculum detail, success metrics, international scope) that the site does not publish.

• ›All content-bearing steps fetched the same URL (360marketing.school/) repeatedly; no internal site navigation occurred. The agent typed the URL from memory rather than discovering child pages, indicating the site offers no visible information architecture or site map.
• ›Pricing is deliberately non-public: the site provides no cost information, forcing prospects into a contact funnel (brochure download, email, registration). This is a business practice, not a technical gap, but it made pricing impossible to retrieve without side-channel contact.
• ›The web search (step 4) surfaced results for a completely different product (Marketing 360 software platform), contaminating the search namespace. The agent correctly distinguished them but found no pricing data for the school in search results.
• ›The agent's differentiation section ([2]) relied almost entirely on inferential positioning claims extracted from the homepage copy ('think beyond clicks', cohort model, placement partners) rather than explicit competitive comparisons. The site does not articulate what alternatives exist or how it differs from them.
• ›Significant claims in the final response (graduate job placement rates, salary outcomes, international student eligibility, detailed curriculum breakdown) were marked as unfound because the site does not publish these—the agent correctly did not fabricate them from model memory, maintaining fidelity to what was actually retrieved.