The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Zeal's positioning, target market, and core features by systematically visiting the platform's main product pages and supporting resources. The site proved highly navigable for discovery and identity—Zeal's homepage and feature pages clearly communicated their three-pillar model (Onboard, Pay, Bill), target verticals, and differentiators. However, the agent could not fulfill the pricing portion of the task: despite thorough searching, Zeal deliberately withholds specific pricing information from public pages, forcing reliance on indirect references (revenue-share model, cost calculators) rather than transparent rates.

• ›The homepage (step 1) and dedicated feature pages (steps 5, 6, 7) provided direct, clear articulation of what Zeal does and who it's for; the About page (step 9) and Overview page (step 18) reinforced positioning and compliance focus without friction.
• ›Zeal publishes no /pricing or /cost page; searches (steps 11–12) and direct URL guesses (step 3) both returned 404s. The agent worked around this by finding the EOR Cost Calculator (step 13) and monetization guide (step 16), which revealed the revenue-sharing model but not customer-facing pricing tiers—a significant gap for evaluation.
• ›The agent successfully cited 10 sources in its final response, all of which returned 200 responses and contained relevant content; however, this required fallback to web search and educated guesses about URL structure, indicating Zeal's site structure is predictable but doesn't self-advertise all resources in a centralized nav.
• ›Competitor/alternative positioning was inferred from blog content (step 14: 'Zeal vs Payment Processors') rather than from a structured comparison page, suggesting Zeal relies on narrative differentiation rather than feature matrices.