The agent obtained a partial but substantive picture of CHW's business model, pricing, and core value proposition by fetching the homepage and two key subpages. However, the site does not publish complete rental pricing, service contract details, or named competitor comparisons, requiring the agent to disclose gaps and flag assumptions from the savings calculator as unverified.

• ›The homepage and calculator page supply explicit pricing for purchase (€3,250–€7,450 excl. VAT) but rental pricing is published only as 'custom quote,' forcing reliance on the calculator's €15/month assumption, which the agent correctly flagged as an unverified assumption rather than a published rate.
• ›The bespaarcheck calculator is the primary vehicle for CHW's differentiation claim (no bean contract saves €14,181 over 60 months), but the page does not state calculator assumptions (bean price ratios, machine cost allocation, service inclusion) clearly enough to verify the comparison independently — the agent caught this gap.
• ›The /huren page lists rental as available but omits critical commercial terms (deposit, term length, what service covers, cancellation), so the agent correctly identified these as 'missing' rather than inferring from model memory.
• ›The agent did not fetch /service, /seo-index (comparison articles), or machine detail pages, so it cannot verify competitor-specific comparisons or warranty/service contract contents; the agent transparently disclosed this scope boundary in the final response.
• ›Site navigation surfaces key resources (bespaarcheck, huren, keuzehulp) via links from the homepage, enabling the agent to discover them natively, but the site does not publish prices in a structured, machine-readable format (many are 'op aanvraag'), limiting agent-native transactability.