Agent successfully gathered a comprehensive overview of Factory's purpose, pricing, and positioning by fetching the homepage, sitemap, pricing page, and a vendor-written comparison article. The site made pricing and core product claims easily accessible, but left gaps on usage limits, free trials, annual discounts, and independent competitive analysis.

• ›Pricing page was directly indexed in sitemap and fetched successfully, providing all tier names, monthly costs, and feature differentiators in clear tabular form — site made commercial intent answerable.
• ›Homepage content (step [0], typed from memory but returned immediately) supplied the core positioning ('agent-native platform,' Droids, integration with existing tools) without requiring navigation — strong identity clarity for discovery.
• ›Sitemap (step [2]) was well-formed and comprehensive, exposing comparison articles (/articles/factory-vs-cursor, etc.) and deployment options, but all comparisons are vendor-written; agent found no third-party analysis and noted this limitation.
• ›Usage limits described only as relative multiples ('5x Pro,' '10x Pro') with no absolute token/request figures, overage rates, or FAQ answers showing on pricing page — incomplete metering transparency forced agent to flag this as confusing rather than answerable.
• ›Agent explicitly noted it did not fetch docs.factory.com despite homepage link, because sitemap had no /docs path; site did not surface documentation structure, leaving completeness unverified.