The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Radar's platform, pricing, and competitive positioning by combining technical documentation fetched from docs.radar.com with marketing and pricing pages from radar.com. However, the docs site itself is purely technical (API reference, SDK guides) and lacks business-context information—the agent had to bridge to the main website and conduct web searches to answer the discovery-oriented questions about what Radar does, who it's for, pricing, and how it differs from alternatives.

• ›docs.radar.com is a technical-only documentation site (Mintlify-based) with no pricing, overview, or competitive comparison pages; the agent discovered this via 404s on /overview, /pricing, and /setup, then pivoted to llms.txt and markdown files which contained API and feature documentation.
• ›The agent successfully fetched radar.com/pricing and radar.com/ (the main site) as separate domains to answer pricing and positioning questions; these were discovered via prior knowledge and web search, not through navigation from the docs site itself.
• ›The llms.txt and llms-full.txt artifact probes were critical routing aids—they exposed the full documentation structure (geofencing overview, geofences, trips, places, regions, fraud, maps overview, FAQs) and allowed the agent to discover content-bearing markdown files without guessing URLs.
• ›Competitive positioning information came from radar.com/blog/google-maps-api-cost (a blog post) rather than from comparative docs; the agent had to use web search to find alternatives like Bluedot and GeoSpark.
• ›The final answer correctly distinguishes docs.radar.com (technical reference) from radar.com (product/marketing), but the agent had to work around the site's information architecture rather than following a natural path.