fbmedia.se
partial
Claude Code
intent

What does fbmedia.se do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

19steps
101.2sduration
$1.2454cost
362,822tokens
20 steps1 reasoning step9 searches
home
home
/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/9
/work
search
/intro
search
search
search
search
search
search
search
/wp-json/wp/v2/pages
/wp-json/wp/v2/pages
search
/om-oss
/tjanster
/priser
90%
on-site discovery
70%
reliability
50%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource50%
  • web search10%
  • prior knowledge40%
insight

The agent assembled a partial but substantive overview of FBM's services, target market, and positioning by combining fragments from the site's homepage, intro page, and work/results page. However, it could not locate pricing or detailed case studies, which limits completeness. The site's structure and content delivery made key information difficult to extract—the agent had to rely on prior knowledge (40% of sources) and could only retrieve homepage content via direct URL guesses; navigation structure was unclear, and several expected pages (about, services, pricing) returned 404s.

  • ›Steps [0], [1], [8], [9], [11] provided fragmented content from the homepage, an 'Intro' page, a 'Results/Work' page, but all returned truncated HTML (4400+ chars truncated). The agent could only infer FBM's service offerings and positioning from partial snippets, not complete, coherent pages.
  • ›Expected navigation paths failed: /om-oss (about), /tjanster (services), /priser (pricing) all returned 404s [steps 2, 3, 4]. The agent could not discover the site's own information architecture and resorted to guessing URLs and web search.
  • ›Pricing information was entirely absent from the site. The agent conducted 4 targeted searches for pricing [steps 10, 13, 16] and a site-specific search [step 16: 'site:fbmedia.se priser paket tjänster'] but found no public pricing page or cost information. The site offers no transparency on how services are packaged or priced.
  • ›The agent relied heavily on prior knowledge (40%) and searches (10%) because the site's own pages were truncated and its IA was broken. Only 50% of source attribution came from artifacts (the fetched pages themselves), suggesting the site does not surface information in a machine-readable or complete format.
  • ›The agent cited sources from the site's own URLs [fbmedia.se, fbmedia.se/identitet, fbmedia.se/intro, fbmedia.se/work], but none of these fetch responses were complete enough to be independently readable in the trajectory—they were all truncated.

Help the next agent finish on fbmedia.se

Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.

or talk to us about agent readiness →