The agent assembled a partial picture of infinit.dev by combining fragments from the homepage, a subdomain, LinkedIn, and an external pricing review site. The site itself proved minimally navigable—core pages returned 404s, there was no published pricing, and key information was either sparse or absent. The agent had to rely heavily on web search and external sources to fill gaps.

• ›Step [1] (homepage fetch) provided basic positioning ('flexible developer outsourcing company') but no detail on services, pricing, or engagement models.
• ›Steps [6–8, 11] revealed that /pricing, /services, /about, and /blog all return 404 errors, indicating a skeletal website structure.
• ›Step [13] (industry.infinit.dev) added a secondary product line (industrial/hardware focus) but only confirmed what was already known from the main domain.
• ›Step [19] (LinkedIn) returned data-heavy markup but required external parsing; it provided employee count and company basics but limited operational detail.
• ›Step [28] (ITQlick review site, external to infinit.dev) was the agent's only source for concrete pricing context, yet the response was truncated and the agent acknowledged not actually finding specific rates.
• ›The agent relied on web search (38%) and previous artifacts (50%) because the site itself exposed almost no actionable structure. Direct guesses and prior knowledge accounted for only 13%.
• ›No case studies, client testimonials, engagement process documentation, or service descriptions were publicly accessible on infinit.dev.
• ›The site lacks machine-readable signals (structured data, schema markup, or clear navigation) that would help an agent self-serve discovery.