The agent read the homepage and a follow-up fetch that together covered services, audience, contact, FAQ timelines and city coverage, answering the task fully. The site was largely navigable and self-describing, though fees, address and differentiators were absent and had to be reported as gaps.

• ›The homepage exposed the practice's services, audience, contact channels and FAQ in a single fetchable page, so nearly every answer was grounded in site content.
• ›Pricing was not published anywhere on the site; the agent correctly reported this gap rather than inferring costs.
• ›The site's own claim of 'ampla cobertura nacional' conflicts with the explicit list of served cities, a contradiction the agent flagged.
• ›Differentiation claims are generic ('atenção personalizada') with no comparison, testimonials or case results, leaving the 'how it's different' question thinly answered.
• ›The agent did not check the About, Privacy or Terms pages separately, so those sections were not covered.