The agent satisfied the task by fetching the homepage and key product pages (internet, mobile) to extract service offerings, pricing, target markets, and claimed differentiators. The site published pricing and plan details in accessible form, but did not provide competitor comparisons or complete TV service pricing; the agent identified these gaps explicitly rather than filling them from memory.

• ›All five content steps returned from the same domain (proximus.be/ and its /internet and /mobile subpaths) with no external redirects or search-based discovery; the agent typed the initial URL from memory and then followed internal navigation links, so discoverability via site structure was high.
• ›Pricing and plan tiers were published in machine-readable form: four internet tiers with speeds, data limits, and monthly costs; five mobile tiers with data, calls/SMS, and promotional vs. regular pricing clearly labeled. This made extraction straightforward.
• ›The agent explicitly called out missing information (TV pricing details, no competitor positioning, unexplained 'Full Control' feature, enterprise pricing not on consumer site) rather than inventing it—indicating the site's content gaps were clear and the agent grounded its answer in what was actually fetched.
• ›Bundle pricing was mentioned only as a promotional offer (€62.98/month for internet + TV + Netflix) on the homepage; no dedicated pricing page for TV or bundle permutations was discovered, leaving that product tier partially opaque.
• ›Differentiators were stated by Proximus itself ('only operator with end-to-end fiber,' 'unbreakable 5G,' '24/7 support') but no independent comparison to Belgacom, Orange, or other competitors appeared on the site or in the agent's fetches, so the 'premium service-focused' positioning is Proximus's own claim rather than validated comparison.