Agent successfully built a comprehensive overview of Shomi by harvesting content from the homepage, a cost-breakdown article, and contact pages, supplemented by web search to identify competitors. The site was navigable at root URLs but missing expected navigation paths (/products, /pricing returning 404s); the agent compensated by typing URLs from memory and using search.

• ›Step [1] (homepage fetch) provided core product names and positioning but lacked pricing and detailed differentiation; step [6] (homepage re-fetch) supplied additional pricing philosophy and customer types, suggesting the homepage contained this info but was not fully captured in step [1]'s response.
• ›Step [9] was the only content-bearing fetch of an article URL; it supplied concrete cost breakdowns and budget ranges ($50K–$500K+) that do not appear in the homepage fetches, indicating Shomi publishes pricing education via blog content rather than dedicated pricing pages.
• ›Steps [2], [3], [4], [5] all failed (404/500), revealing the site's URL structure does not match typical /products, /pricing, /about, /solutions paths; agent worked around this by re-fetching the homepage and guessing /contact, which succeeded.
• ›Step [8] (web search) was necessary to identify competitors; the site itself does not mention them, and search results snippet text contained competitor names (Exhibit Express, DXP Display, etc.) without requiring a fetch of third-party pages.
• ›Agent's final claim about 'no customer reviews or case studies visible' and 'limited competitive differentiation details' reflects model reasoning about what *should* be on the site, not what was actually fetched or stated to be absent—a minor intrusion of expectation over evidence.