Agent successfully extracted and synthesized what the site explicitly states about R+G Arquitectura's services, target market, and positioning, but had to note extensive gaps (no pricing, no team credentials, no portfolio samples) that the site does not surface. Navigation was minimal friction—all information came from the homepage fetched four times, suggesting the site either consolidates everything on one page or lacks deeper navigable content.

• ›The site provides only the homepage as a content source across four fetches; no internal navigation was followed or made available, indicating either a single-page site or poor discoverability of subpages. The agent relied entirely on memory-typed URLs rather than discovered links.
• ›Pricing is genuinely absent from site content—no ranges, models, or contact forms visible. The agent correctly identified this as a custom-quote requirement and cited the contact information the site does publish.
• ›The site lacks credibility markers standard for professional services (team bios, licenses, certifications, case studies, testimonials). The agent identified this absence explicitly rather than inferring from model memory, showing accurate distinction between site gaps and missing data.
• ›The site mentions a portfolio but does not expose it on the homepage or provide a direct link fragment the agent could follow, creating a discoverability gap between the stated resource and its actual accessibility.
• ›Service terminology ('Proyecto Arquitectónico' vs 'Proyecto Ejecutivo') appears on the site without plain-language explanation, requiring either Spanish fluency or external knowledge to parse—this is a site usability issue the agent flagged as jargon without translation.