The agent successfully gathered what Conectei does, who it serves, how it's priced, and its claimed differentiation from three accessible pages (homepage, pricing, about). The site was moderately navigable—key pages existed and returned usable content—but lacked detail on competitor positioning, credit cost breakdowns, and national geographic applicability, which the agent noted as confusing gaps rather than inventing answers.

• ›Step [1] (homepage) provided comprehensive feature overview—Radar, CRM, portfolio management, AI enrichment—establishing the core product identity in a single fetch; this was agent-ready and clearly structured.
• ›Step [2] (pricing page) explicitly listed all three tiers with monthly/annual costs and credit counts, making pricing transparent; however, the page did not detail which specific actions consume how many credits, forcing the agent to note this as an acknowledged gap rather than fabricate details.
• ›Step [4] (about page) articulated competitive positioning (data intelligence + municipal integration + unified platform) without naming competitors; the agent correctly recognized and flagged this as missing context for true differentiation assessment.
• ›Steps [3] and [5] returned 404s (/precos and /funcionalidades), indicating incomplete site architecture; the agent did not attempt workarounds or guess, instead proceeding with what was available—a sign of appropriate epistemic restraint.
• ›The agent's final response explicitly separated facts retrieved from the site (what they do, pricing, claimed differentiators) from acknowledged knowledge gaps (competitor comparison, credit cost transparency, geographic coverage), demonstrating it did not conflate model priors with actual site content.