The agent assembled a partial but coherent explanation of IQOS Lithuania by working around direct site access failures, relying entirely on web search results and external sources about heated tobacco products. The target domain (iqos.lt and lt.iqos.com) blocked all fetch attempts, forcing the agent to piece together product positioning, pricing ranges, and technical details from third-party sources and search snippets rather than primary content.

• ›Both iqos.lt and lt.iqos.com returned HTTP 403 Forbidden, making direct content retrieval impossible; the agent never accessed a page from the target domain.
• ›Step [4] search snippets provided product lineup names (ILUMA ONE, ILUMA PRIME, ILUMA i series), delivery options (300+ partner stores, free shipping), and age verification policy — these were the core facts about the site's offerings.
• ›Step [6] search results supplied technical details about IQOS operation (ceramic heating, ~350°C, aerosol delivery) and differentiation from cigarettes/e-cigs, but these facts came from third-party sources (UT MD Anderson, Vaping360) not from iqos.lt itself.
• ›Step [7] confirmed product availability in Lithuania but did not yield EUR pricing; the agent acknowledged this gap explicitly and disclosed it could not verify local-currency costs.
• ›The agent correctly distinguished what it retrieved (product names, general positioning, how heated tobacco works) from what it could not verify (exact pricing, model feature differences, current promotions), showing appropriate epistemic humility despite the site's inaccessibility.