The agent reached the homepage and two linked pages (commissions and Flexible), extracted the company's services, fee schedule, and claims, and flagged gaps and inconsistencies. The site was largely navigable and gave concrete pricing, though several fee mechanics and the competitive positioning were left undefined.

• ›Pricing for Prime Independence and Flexible was published in full on a dedicated /comisioane page, with turnover bands, minimums, and fixed rates the agent could cite directly.
• ›The site makes no comparisons with other brokers, so the 'how it differs from alternatives' part of the task could not be answered from site content.
• ›Several fee definitions are ambiguous or undefined on the site (turnover measurement, 'net profit', band boundaries, dividend fee wording), requiring the agent to flag rather than explain them.
• ›Internal inconsistency on the homepage: experience is stated as both 27+ and 30+ years, and some analysis content is gated behind login.
• ›Pages were linked from the homepage and the agent followed them in sequence, so navigation was straightforward even though the substance had gaps.