The agent assembled a reasonably complete picture of GuardaMarca's core offering (trademark monitoring via INPI alerts on WhatsApp) and pricing structure from two fetches of the homepage and a free lookup tool page, but encountered fragmented, unclear pricing (mismatched installment math, undefined bonuses) and missing company/contact details that prevented a fully confident assessment.

• ›All substantive content came from two pages on the target domain: the homepage and the /verificar-marca lookup tool. No external sources or searches were used, and no third-party verification of claims occurred.
• ›Pricing information was present on the homepage but internally inconsistent (annual plan shown as both R$ 382 and 12×R$ 39,46 ≈ R$ 473), and the agent correctly flagged this arithmetic discrepancy as a confusing gap rather than resolving it by guessing.
• ›The homepage bundled FAQ, pricing, and signup into a single page with no separate About, Pricing, or Contact pages — the agent had to extract information from fragments and noted the absence of company registration details (CNPJ, formal name, contact info) that would normally appear in footers or legal pages.
• ›The free lookup tool page (/verificar-marca) did not clarify whether the paid monitoring service required signup or payment, leaving the boundary between free and paid features ambiguous on the site itself.
• ›The agent correctly attributed unverified claims (like the 'Antes/Depois' comparison and 'how it's different' section) to the site's own assertions rather than sourcing them externally, noting that no explicit comparison to competitors or INPI's own tools was present on the domain.