The agent gathered core information about Kalivoa's function, pricing, and certification system from the homepage and pricing page, but encountered significant ambiguities in beta-to-free transitions, launch dates, welcome-offer eligibility, and certification methodology that the site did not clarify. The site is partially navigable for understanding the product, but critical details are incomplete or scattered across pages the agent did not reach.

• ›Steps [0] and [1] provided the bulk of pricing and product information directly from the site, but the pricing page left key questions unanswered: when paid plans launch, how beta users transition to the free tier, and how the welcome-offer '15 new sign-ups' limit is enforced.
• ›Step [2] (certification page) explained the evidence-rating system but omitted the mathematical formula for score calculation, the duration of the 'observation period', and how pending tickets transition to confirmed states—forcing the agent to flag these as 'unspecified' rather than unavailable.
• ›The agent correctly identified that the site does not compare Kalivoa to competitors, so the 'differentiation' section relies on self-reported distinctive claims (OCR import, certification proof levels) without third-party validation or benchmarking.
• ›The agent discovered all three content-bearing steps by direct URL navigation (two from homepage links, one typed from memory), showing the site's navigation structure is functional but that key detail pages exist that the agent did not fetch (FAQ, features, bookmaker support, terms).
• ›The agent transparently noted what it did not check (FAQ, features, bookmaker, responsible-gambling, terms, English version, third-party reviews), correctly defining the partial outcome as incomplete coverage rather than incorrect coverage.