The agent assembled a serviceable overview of Giraffe360's business model and positioning, but worked around a non-responsive official website by relying entirely on third-party sources and search results. Direct pricing tiers and plan details remained inaccessible despite being advertised on the official site.

• ›The official Giraffe360 domain returned 202 responses on all direct fetches (steps [0–1], [3–4]), preventing access to authoritative pricing and plan details; the agent pivoted to external sources without recovering the primary information.
• ›Third-party review and pricing-guide content (steps [5–6]) provided enough substance to explain the product, positioning, and subscription-based economics, but lacked granular plan tiers and current pricing limits that the agent cited as missing.
• ›Search results (step [2]) included direct links to giraffe360.com/us/build-your-plan, which is exactly where pricing should live, but the fetch failed (202 response), leaving the agent unable to fulfill the pricing request completely.
• ›The agent correctly identified and admitted gaps (plan-tier details, specific tier limits, head-to-head competitor comparisons, current pricing accuracy) rather than inventing them, which preserved credibility despite a partial outcome.
• ›No on-domain structured data, llms.txt, or API documentation was discovered or accessible, forcing the agent to rely on inferences from external reviews about feature parity and market positioning.