The agent assembled a partial but useful overview of MyLife by fetching the homepage and abonnementen page, then supplemented with third-party price estimates from web search when the official site revealed no pricing. The site is poorly navigable for comparative shopping: it hides prices, omits plan differentiation details, and leaves key terms (cancellation, joining fees, facility availability) scattered or absent from the pages fetched.

• ›The official MyLife site publishes no prices, monthly costs, joining fees, or cancellation terms on its homepage or dedicated abonnementen page—the agent had to resort to third-party gym listing sites and a cancellation-service page to surface even rough price estimates (€55–75/month range), and those sources are dated and location-variable.
• ›Plan differentiation is opaque: FIT and LIFE memberships are described identically in content; the only stated difference is contract length (1 vs. 2 years). The agent correctly flagged this as confusing and could not explain why a buyer would choose one over the other.
• ›Critical commercial terms are missing from the two pages fetched: no first-month cost, no joining fee visibility, no notice periods for early cancellation, and no statement of which facilities (sauna, physiotherapy, childcare) are available at which of the 24 clubs.
• ›The agent successfully navigated the site's primary structure (homepage → abonnementen) but hit a dead-end on pricing and had to pivot to external sources; it did not attempt the FAQ or individual club pages, which may have contained some answers but were not linked intuitively from the marketing copy.
• ›The response correctly attributes all third-party price data to external sources (sportlist, newgym, 123opzeggen) and marks them as 'unverified' and dated, demonstrating appropriate confidence-handling when official data is absent.