The agent successfully gathered comprehensive information about letmepost.dev by relying almost entirely on the GitHub README (step 10), which contained all core claims about positioning, pricing, features, and differentiators. The website itself proved difficult to extract due to heavy JavaScript rendering, forcing the agent to pivot to the open-source repository as the canonical source—a signal that the marketing site is not machine-readable but the project's documentation is well-structured and explicit.

• ›Step 10 (GitHub README) was the sole content-bearing fetch that populated the final answer. It explicitly stated the value proposition ('fails loudly'), the pricing tiers ($79 Pro, $299 Business, self-hosted unlimited), the named alternatives (Ayrshare, Postiz, Buffer, Hootsuite, Hypefury), and the key differentiators (transparent errors, no per-profile pricing, open source, idempotency, pinned platform versions, async media rejection, MCP support).
• ›Steps 1, 3, 4, 8 (the actual website pages) returned Next.js/Mintlify HTML that was heavily truncated and JavaScript-dependent; none of their responses contained readable text content. The agent could not extract pricing, features, or positioning from the marketing site itself—it had to be inferred from prior knowledge or sourced from GitHub.
• ›Steps 5, 11, 13 (web searches) acted as routers, surfacing the GitHub URL and confirming the competitor landscape, but the search snippets themselves did not contain the detailed answer. The agent had to follow through to step 10 to get the full story.
• ›The site publishes a clear, developer-friendly README on GitHub that serves as the authoritative source for positioning and pricing. The marketing website (letmepost.dev) appears to be a visual showcase with limited structured data or fallback plain-text content, making it opaque to agents unless JavaScript is executed.