Agent successfully gathered what Scantix offers (3D ground scans, drone flights, shared viewer for construction sites in Innsbruck and Munich) and who it targets (site teams), but the site publishes no pricing, accuracy claims, or client proof, and contains an unexplained 1,000× unit error. Agent supplemented with external competitor examples from web search, which turned up no direct mention of Scantix itself.

• ›The site explicitly declines to publish pricing, deliverables, or turnaround times—all quoted per-project via contact form. Agent correctly surfaced this as a navigability gap, not a finding.
• ›Homepage contains a gross factual error: lists both '118 km²' and 'about 118,400 m²' for the same metric, differing by ~1,000×. Both marked preliminary. This was fetched and flagged by agent.
• ›Site never names competitors or positions against alternatives; only compares 3D scans vs. photos (spatial relationships vs. detail). Agent's external examples (3D Padelt, Miviso) came from web search, not site disclosure.
• ›Coverage is ambiguous across pages: homepage says 'Innsbruck and Munich,' subpage adds 'Tyrol,' drone page lists 'Innsbruck, Tirol, and Munich.' Site does not clarify whether these are exclusive areas.
• ›No client names, case studies, testimonials, certifications, founding date, or team background published. 'Autonomous scanning' is promised but not explained. Accuracy for measurements is advertised without figures or tolerances.
• ›Agent discovered all content by following homepage links or typing domain from memory; web search for 'Scantix' returned zero results about the company itself, suggesting low or no web presence.