condu.co
success
Claude Code
intent

What does condu.co do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

18steps
59.1sduration
$0.5808cost
243,647tokens
30 steps12 reasoning steps2 searches
home
/en
/en.md
/en/products/conduco-ai
/en/products/conduco-a…
/en/services/ai
/en/services/ai.md
/en/services/sovereignty
/en/services/sovereign…
/en/products
/en/products.md
search
search
/en/pricing
/en/features
/en/about
/en/services/business.md
/en/services/public-se…
100%
on-site discovery
81%
reliability
63%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource63%
  • prior knowledge38%
insight

The agent successfully gathered a comprehensive understanding of condu.co by extracting markdown versions of the site's main content pages, but had to work around a significant gap: pricing information is not published anywhere on the site. The agent assembled answers about what condu.co does, who they serve, and how they differentiate from a fragmented set of landing pages; pricing had to be reported as 'not found' rather than answered.

  • ›Steps [9, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 24] all returned markdown versions of landing pages (.md files) that contained the core positioning, service descriptions, and product information. The site surfaces these via content negotiation or direct markdown URLs rather than rendering rich HTML—this made extraction clean but reveals the site is not optimized for web scraping or semantic richness.
  • ›The agent discovered resources by guessing standard URL paths (/en/services/ai, /en/products, /en/services/public-sector) and found them, but standard discovery pages (/pricing, /features, /about) returned 404s. This indicates a thin navigation layer and no conventional pricing or feature discovery affordances.
  • ›Pricing was explicitly absent: the agent made two web search attempts (steps [26, 28]) hoping to find pricing external to the site, both returned irrelevant results for unrelated companies named 'Conductor' or 'Conduit.' The final answer correctly flags this as 'confusing/not found' and characterizes the contact-based quote model. The site is not agent-ready for cost discovery.
  • ›The site's structure relies on markdown file availability (.md routes) rather than SEO-optimized HTML pages, suggesting a developer-facing or content-first architecture. HTML responses in steps [1, 3, 11, 12, 13, 22] were truncated and not content-bearing; the markdown versions in [9, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 24] were the actual sources of truth.
  • ›Client examples (Unilever, Statista, Münster District Administration, Town of Vreden) and service segmentation (businesses, public sector, startups) were extracted from the markdown, but no case studies, implementation timelines, or resource commitment details were published—limiting agent ability to assess fit without human handoff.

Help the next agent finish on condu.co

Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.

or talk to us about agent readiness →