Agent successfully retrieved and synthesized KoBo's core positioning, services, target market, and claimed differentiation from the homepage alone. The site is navigable but pricing and case study depth are absent; the agent identified these gaps transparently rather than fabricating details.

• ›All substantive claims derive from the single homepage fetch (step [1] returned the comprehensive overview; steps [2–4] re-fetched the same URL). The site publishes its value proposition and services inline but does not structure them as separate, discoverable pages.
• ›Pricing is genuinely absent from the site—the agent correctly reported this as a gap requiring direct contact, rather than inferring or guessing a model-memory price range.
• ›The agent's differentiation analysis ('Specialization', 'End-to-end accountability', 'Direct founder involvement') is grounded in explicit site language (e.g., 'We richten ons op vastgoedprojecten', 'We stoppen niet bij een lead', 'Korte lijnen'), not model inference.
• ›Case study detail (BOSUNITS: 78 leads, 12 sales) was present on the homepage but the agent flagged the lack of timeline and investment context—a reasonable observation about what the site did NOT expose, not a model-memory invention.
• ›The agent's identification of missing information (team size, retainer vs. project-based fees, budget range) reflects the site's actual content boundaries, not the model's speculation; the agent stayed disciplined about what it could and could not confirm.