The agent could not read Hertz's own site in usable depth—the homepage returned German-only headers, the English US page gave minimal content, and corporate/deals URLs failed—and assembled its answer almost entirely from third-party comparison sites and loyalty program guides found via web search. The site itself was effectively non-navigable for this discovery task.

• ›Both the German and English homepages returned near-empty responses (headers and cookie banners only), with no navigation links, pricing, fleet info, or booking flows visible. The agent could not extract core business facts from Hertz's own site.
• ›The agent was forced to rely on step [7]'s web search results, which returned third-party comparison sites, loyalty program guides, and SEC filings—none of them Hertz's own public site. This indicates the site published no discoverable, machine-readable business description.
• ›The agent attempted to reach corporate.hertz.com (step [3]) and www.hertz.com/us/en/rental-car-deals (step [5]) from memory, both failed (DNS error and 404). These indicate either unavailable subdomains or poor URL structure, blocking the agent's navigation strategy.
• ›All sources cited in the final response are external (third-party guides and Hertz's own loyalty FAQ pages), not the main hertz.com site. The agent's core answer about what Hertz does, who it serves, and how it differs relies on model memory applied to third-party data, not on site-supplied positioning.
• ›The agent explicitly flagged that loyalty tier thresholds, location counts, and fleet details vary across sources and could not be verified against Hertz's own current terms—a direct result of the site's inaccessibility.